The Roseboro Defense! Gang Robbery or Mistaken Identity?

As of this morning, a poster on the Talkback Forum of the Lancasteronline site has indicated that she can't wait to tell her story in court!
My knowledge of this woman is limited, but I believe she is the mother of a young man shot and killed while attempting a robbery in Lancaster County shortly before the Roseboro murder.
Others have thrown the theory out there that a gang robbery was the impetus for Jan Roseboro's killing, with the nebulous mention of $40,000 worth of jewelry being missing. That claim came from Mike Roseboro via his defense attorney, Mr. Sodomsky.
It has yet to be confirmed whether the jewelry is, indeed, missing, or ever was.
The poster I refer to has made it sound as if she will be testifying for the defense.

A gang killing? A robbery?

There were no witnesses to the brutal attack on Jan. But what robber or gang hangs around and cleans up the murder scene? There was no overt blood evidence found anywhere on the Roseboro property. That pretty much negates the gang robbery theory.

But as we all know, the defense simply has to create reasonable doubt.
If Mr. Sodomsky can make 12 people believe that the gang came in the night, quietly and brutally attacked and killed Jan Roseboro, then hung out and worked like a well-oiled machine removing all possible clues of a beating or killing, then he is worth his weight in salt.


Or was it a case of mistaken identity? The poster claims that she was told to stay out of Lancaster after the murder of her son. I have no details about that at this point.
She claims that the "wrong blond" was killed and that she is the "other blond"!
This could get very interesting........